Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Roy Clark Method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Roy Clark Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. Can't find anything at all online about them; written by a near-SPA with a username related to the band's home state; don't ever appear to have been noticed outside of their home town; entirely sourced to non-RS, mostly blogs by the band members which have been completely deleted and purged, so that even the archive versions no longer exist... I think you know where we are going with this, but let's do this AfD properly. Richard3120 (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.