Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The She Set

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJ^Talk 19:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The She Set

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non notable article which does not meet the guidelines for music-related articles, already proposed for deletion but tag was removed by an IP address without any edits to the article. Article consists of a list of band member's names, some not even full names. ^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 00:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 00:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Have just discovered this has been deleted multiple times before. --^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 00:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete, fals WP:MUSIC with no claim of notability whatsoever. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, yes, obviously. No notability, no coverage, no records, and too much mention of too many boyfriends. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment (All Above): These were the reasons i stated in a prod, but it was removed without anything actually happening to the article. I have contacted the creator of the page regarding the debate, but how much longer must we wait before closing it? --^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 02:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt to prevent recreation of vanity page on non-notable band.Yobmod (talk) 09:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is no coverage in reliable sources. This brief announcement in a event listing on NME is the closest thing to coverage that I was able to find. -- Whpq (talk) 16:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.