Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shepherds Rest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Shepherds Rest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Shepherds Rest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A local pub, part of the large Greene King chain, that is relatively young (opened in 2000) and doesn't meet WP:NCORP. There are routine listings and pub reviews, but insufficient to establish notability. PROD contested with justification given (see Talk:The Shepherds Rest#Proposed Deletion Objection). Klbrain (talk) 18:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Architecture, Travel and tourism, and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is clearly a non-notable pub. There is insignificant coverage (WP:GNG) and Tripadvisor is not a reputable reference source to establish notability. It would be different if this building was listed or at least had architectural coverage but it really is just an average Greene King Pub. Coldupnorth (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Searching finds no significant coverage by any kind if source, independent, reliable or not, and this isn't for lack of internet coverage of the ___location and time period this place has existed. I am glad that Craig finds it a beloved local establishment though. Maybe one day I can visit :) Moritoriko (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : There is insignificant coverage (WP:GNG) Gauravs 51 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.