Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Triptych Deluxe Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect is already mentioned at The Triptych, anything further can be merged. W.marsh 19:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Triptych Deluxe Edition

I added the deletion tag because the album is already covered in depth in the original album's article (The Triptych). Re-released albums traditionally aren't seen as important enough to warrant an article all by itself, and I certainly think that's the case here. Anyone feel differently? Roofi's Publicist 03:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 04:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to The Triptych per nom. The album hasn't even come out yet. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 06:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Otherwise it just gets silly, and here's an example of what could happen. I have an original (UK) Beatles Revolver album. It got scratched, so I replaced it in late 1970s and the replacement was German. I have since bought the CD. That's 3 copies (ain't I been ripped off!), all slightly different but easily covered in one single article. The important thing is the title - any minor differences are easily covered in the same substantive article, because, quite simply, I will look up Revolver and not Revolver-CD or Revolver (German pressing) or..... Emeraude 22:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect Deserves a one or two sentance note in the parent article, not a completely new article. --Jayron32 05:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom or merge if anyone cares enough to. Sandstein 06:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.