Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Value of Data Media Security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete, worthless advert.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 19:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advert. "Buy our Media Safes!... sigh. Brad101 00:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete - essay, spam, oh yeah and adver. per nom. Too bad there isn't a good speedy criteria for this. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 00:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete pure advert.--Jersey Devil 00:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment As noted above by AbsolutDan there is not catagory in WP:SPEEDY for spam. In fact, it says spam is not subject to a speedy. Viridae 01:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - spam doktorb | words 00:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per AbsolutDan. ^Triana_C 01:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pure unadulterated spam. Viridae 01:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as advert and WP:OR.AdamBiswanger1 01:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:SPAM. --Coredesat 02:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Anything that isn't an advertisement is already covered at physical security and its progeny. Peyna 03:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Blatant advertisement. Deyyaz ^{[ Talk | Contribs ]} 04:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as spam, but not Speedy per WP:CSD (noncritereon 8). — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk 04:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:SPAM Jammo (SM247) 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the original version of the article was clearly spam; commercial link and all. What's left is nothing that isn't covered elsewhere. Kuru ^talk 12:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete -- ad -- MrDolomite 14:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - advertisement Ladybirdintheuk 14:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - surprised not to find any article on "fire safe", could do with a good NPOV article on the overall topic. Ace of Risk 16:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.