Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The animation Showcase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 23:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The animation Showcase

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any notability beyond inherited (hence not a speedy delete, but I did think about it). Also reads very promotionally and a bit like puffery (how many "notables" are there. Slatersteven (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Also creator may have a coi.Slatersteven (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 13:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to change and modify any part of the article that needs to be in order to make it clean and usable for the Wikipedia Community. Let me know. Siward (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources might help to establish notability.Slatersteven (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article on Variety (magazine) is available in the animation edition of t his year about the event.

Yes there is a huge article in Variety that just appeared today, http://variety.com/2018/film/festivals/animation-showcase-boosts-shorts-around-the-world-1202700369/ ! The Article should stay. Slatersteven don't you think ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.16.234.67 (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily, generally we need more then one source establishing notability WP:GNG. I am not sure that one article in variety is quite enough to circumvent that.Slatersteven (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also this new source contradicts the article.Slatersteven (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as per the variety article Atlantic306 (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Variety + coverage is sufficient to establish notability. At worst a merge to Soho House would be warranted. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.