- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was G4 speedy delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Clone Nancy talk 15:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The clone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Film doesn't seem to exist, let alone be notable... PretzelsTalk! 08:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Quick google search finds us as the first result, little or no content, definitely not notable. The Flying Spaghetti Monster! 09:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 10:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No ghits to mention. Article was deleted and immediately recreated by OP. Classic case for speedy if you ask me. -- Alexf(talk) 12:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No content, no sources, not notable. DavidWS (talk) 13:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Found article was already deleted at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Clone -- Alexf(talk) 12:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I added db-g4 to it. Schuym1 (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.