Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The six essentials of software testing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by me. In addition to what is said below, the article promotes a particular corporation. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The six essentials of software testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a how-to. This is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. PROD nomination was deleted. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 01:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an essay. JJL (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Incurably subjective. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikihow or Wikibooks. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 02:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are we sure this isn't copied out of the source? Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 02:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I agree with Riding Hood; this was probably copied from the source. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — this sounds just like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exciting Powerpoint presentations in 7 easy steps. Anyways, a textbook how-to article - a no-no. MuZemike (talk) 03:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.