- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —freak(talk) 06:03, Nov. 9, 2006 (UTC)
Disputed prod of non-notable college-produced magazine. Valrith 21:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A google search of Thecompoundword -wikipedia reveals a whole 316 hits. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Daniel Olsen 03:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notability asserted, the vast majority of it seems to have been written by one user, and that user's knowledge of the paper suggests that he is involved in the writing of it, and that suggests vanity. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 04:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a single mention in any American newspaper according to NewsBank. -newkai t-c 05:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn notable per User:Ultra-Loser.--Dakota 05:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.