- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thedatabank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While article improved a bit since I tagged it, there's still no evidence it meets WP:CORP, prod removed Delete Secret account 15:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 15:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 15:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: promotional article about another B2B company (indistinguishable from the rest of them) with no notable products. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:53, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.