Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of decreasing responsibility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theory of decreasing responsibility

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've already culled a significant amount of unsourced content from here (before my removal), but this just seems to be an idea promoted by a MLM (Primerica) with little to no actual coverage outside of crappy websites online. Seems to have been similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buy term and invest the difference. – Isochrone (T) 21:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. – Isochrone (T) 21:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The page is very small and unsourced. 2001:1970:5ACA:E000:0:0:0:A186 (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't seem to have much coverage online. Most sources are from Primerica, so they don't count towards WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARandomName123 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: surprised to see it was unsourced even before the culling. Independently couldn't find any demonstration of notability. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 17:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.