Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There Is Some Fun Going Forward
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. causa sui (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There Is Some Fun Going Forward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable compilation. 10 pages of Google results shows only this third-party source, which is trivial coverage. PROD was denied because apparently someone has paid a lot of money for this and the owner of the record label is himself notable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable record release (the label's only sampler) on a notable (and incidentally very collectable) record label, established by an extremely notable and influential person. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Response Notability isn't inherited. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree with Ghmyrtle. As the only sampler on this label it's worth noting. Dandelion was one of the most esoteric UK labels of the period, and anyone reading up on it would have an interest in knowing what tracks were selected for the comp. As evidenced by Gary Lucas's comments the sampler had much wider distribution than most Dandelion releases, reaching the USA. Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.