- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was not a very well-written article, but still a valid one. DS (talk) 23:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thetextpage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be spam for advertising-based web site; page was nominated for CSD and denied mhking (talk) 01:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, though weakly. The articles from The Guardian and the BBC, plus a few other minor references suffice, in my opinion, to make the subject pass GNG. Having said that, the article is a pretty bad piece of peacocky fluff and needs an editor's blunt ax. I'll be happy to do it, once the AfD closes (if it's a keep, that is). Drmies (talk) 01:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps Drmies should go ahead and improve the article now.. could lead to more Keep votes. The article is in a sorry state at the moment. GlassCobra 14:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Comment I read the article about thetextpage in The independent. Numerous articles about the website and the creator can be found on google, so it has a right to a wiki page. however the article is not written very well but this is a KEEPer for sure. I think MHking just doesn't like the fact this boy has made money from nothing! hahah KEEP KEEP KEEP 05/10/09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.133.1.77 (talk • contribs) — 62.133.1.77 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.