Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Quick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Think Quick

Think Quick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails basic google search test and WP:BAND, promotional material, possibly self-written BlusterBlaster^kablooie! 13:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. No independent references. Non-notable band. Fails WP:Band. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The references consist of dead links, chat pages, peripheral inclusions in lists, and a child's game that has no relevance to the subject.--Rpclod (talk) 15:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks self promotional--C E (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.