Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Foreign Policy Research Institute. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable program; no independent sources given or found. Could merge to Foreign Policy Research Institute which at least does claim the program; I cannot find any connection to the University of Pennsylvania as claimed in the article. Was previously listed for deletion, received one !vote to delete and none to keep, and was closed as "no consensus" with WP:NPASR. --MelanieN (talk) 04:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. —MelanieN (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge & Redirect to FFPI. A news search for (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) show its reports are picked up globally. It is clearly linked to Uni of Penn, at least by postal address, but I can't find anything independent to sufficiently support notability for its own article. Bigger digger (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 03:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.