Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinking Cap Studio
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thinking Cap Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD: Software program (product) which does not appear to meet the notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. All sources in the article are self published, press releases, or trivial coverage in link collection sites. No reliable sources support notability. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 20:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Disagree with policy/guideline cited, these are viable links proving that this product is discussed. The links provided were found with research, they are not self-published nor press releases. TabithaFournier (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sourcing looks very poor. The vast majority of the refs are not reliable, most of them appear to be trivial coverage at best. (Sorry, I was talking about the linkdump at the bottom of the page. The inline refs are quite poor, one being user reviews -unusable as a ref- and the other a press release) OSborn arfcontribs. 16:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage to establish notability that I can find. The references and links in the article do not establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Are all these relists really needed? The only editor advocating keep is article creator, and has a user name that is the same as Thinking Cap's marketing manager. -- Whpq (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable software. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.