- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Voluntary sector. Cirt (talk) 08:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Third sector (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This material has no sources to back it up, and the term "third sector" is adequately covered in the voluntary sector article. I redirected it there, but it was reverted back again today. I don't want to get into a revert war - do we need a separate Third sector page, or should it be redirected to voluntary sector? --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect. This article is poorly written and has no content. Per nominator, it is adequately dealt with in the voluntary sector article and doesn't meet criteria for it's own article. Verbal chat 11:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect. Sector-schmector! The generally understood term for all kinds of 'not-for-profit' enterprise is 'voluntary'...anything else is nitpicking. Eddie.willers (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.