Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Beat is Distorted

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This Beat is Distorted

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG for musicians. SarahStierch (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 08:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Little to no third-party coverage. jonkerz ♠talk 21:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no musical work that charted, fails many of WP:MUSICBIO's criteria. Bleubeatle (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.