Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Barron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thom Barron

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Thom Barron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR: none of the references currently in the article constitute significant, external coverage in reliable sources. #1 is a promotional profile on a porn site, #2 and #3 are product listings by a porn vendor, and #4 appears to be a self-published internet pornography database. Looking for new sources, I found only a paragraph on a German gay website[1], plus a name-drop in a German LGBT pop culture trivia book [2]. The additional sources on the german version aren't useful either: a wikipedia mirror and some fansites/personal websites. I don't believe that Mr. Barron's industry awards count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. Cheers, gnu57 14:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete. My own search for RS coverage confirmed the nominator's assessment. This article would not have passed any recent version of PORNBIO before it was superseded. There's nothing to support notability per WP:BASIC or WP:NACTOR/WP:ENT either. • Gene93k (talk) 08:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.