Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Topham Petherbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Currie Street, Adelaide#History. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Topham Petherbridge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Thomas Topham Petherbridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Dawnseeker2000 19:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dawnseeker2000 19:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable settler.IceFishing (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:BIO. 2 small mentions in gbooks. LibStar (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect I could find nothing to indicate any degree of notability for the subject in his own right. Yes he definitely existed, and must have had some standing to have a street named after him, but I cannot find anything else despite searches across many historical newspapers. I have merged to Currie Street, Adelaide#History and pretty much exhausted available sources in the process. Given the historical link to a current place it might be a search term hence redirect rather than delete. Aoziwe (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, since the content has been merged well. Aoziwe has done a good job of this. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect.IceFishing (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw nomination – Thank you everyone for helping this article out. The redirect is a fine solution. Dawnseeker2000 02:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - it's essentially a WP:SNOW and a moot point. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.