Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts in reverse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk)  · @951  ·  21:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts in reverse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band that fails WP:MUSIC. Warrah (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DONT DELETE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.58.48.193 (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm finding zero significant coverage for this band in reliable sources; does not meet WP:N or WP:BAND.  Gongshow ^Talk 18:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per Gongshow. Gatoclass (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete - Newly formed band with no coverage in reliable sources, and a self-made EP that hasn't even been released. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.