Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three-month Rule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Notable and {{unencyclopedic}} was added in April '06. Brad101 05:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, already mentioned in Professional wrestling slang#T. Cut out the OR and the page is skimpier that whats on the list page. hateless 06:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete absoloutely nothing notable about that. Viridae 06:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete while I'm aware of the Three Month Rule, it's very much a creation of some internet sites, and certainly isn't notable for Wikipedia. Wolfsbane Kane 09:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Professional wrestling slang#T. Proto///type 11:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per hateless and Proto. Dsreyn 17:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Proto. Avalon 21:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete You can't redirect to a section. Eluchil404 06:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.