Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Maybe Four
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Three Maybe Four (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
IMO fails WP:BAND, but creator says that it does not, see talk page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'm curious where the Sam Moss quote came from... if the band was actually reviewed in Rolling Stone that would certainly help in the notability department, but I'm coming up with zilch on Google for it. 28bytes (talk) 06:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this either a very non-notable band or a hoax. Couldn't find any reliable sources, and i have tried at many ways: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Aritcle is totally unsourced. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Armbrust. Edward321 (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.