- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 19:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Threen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a definition of a word found in a book. Not notable and not needed. GtstrickyTalk or C 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the exact same information is also at Tween. I don't even think this is worth a redirect to Hobbit. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable term and dictionary definition. The [edit] See also shows that this was most likely copied off of Tween. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is trivial even in universe (not even a mathom). It's the sort of ethnological detail that Tolkien would throw into the middle of a paragraph to flesh out the world of Middle-Earth, but I don't believe it was ever used in the books in a substantive way. --Dhartung | Talk 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In a word...Delete Ecoleetage (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.