- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Threquel 2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:NOT#IINFO. Just pointless. Masaruemoto 02:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - micro-classification of information is not what Wikipedia is about (it's micro-classification because the term is non-notable - see currently ongoing AfD of Threquel). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenrd (talk • contribs)
- Delete - Does not comply with WP:NOT and could quite possibly infringe WP:HOAX. As well, it comes into notability suspicion, and is in no way encyclopedic. NSR77 TC 03:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a list/directory Corpx 03:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unimaginative stupidity--ZayZayEM 05:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the above and OR. Doczilla 06:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is just another unsourced, unnecessary filled with original research. Acalamari 20:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Delete Delete as useless Listcruft. SkierRMH 06:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.