Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thronmax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thronmax

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Thronmax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

G11 borderline eligible article on a non notable notable organization attempting to promote their brand via Wikipedia. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus fail to satisfy WP:NCORP. A before search shows unreliable sources such as this and other websites to purchase their products. In all, i am unable to locate any cogent reliable source. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Beyond the fact that this appears to be a giant press release, there are no sources in the article that would establish notability, nor could I find any sources in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I find myself thinking, after reading Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Unay, that this is undisclosed paid editing, and that the copy came from the client. Uncle G (talk) 15:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Agreed, and I have blocked the "article's" creator. Delete. MER-C 14:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete There are some more news about this in Google news, but I didnt see any notable publications. They were mostly reviwes by small gaming publications. Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Brochure article. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 12:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.