Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumbnail gallery post
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thumbnail gallery post (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Complete original research and perpetual spam magnet Will (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep; it's not complete original research, as there is one link there, and perpetual spam magnet is not a reason to delete.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The given reference (a tutorial spanning multiple articles) supports the claims made in the article. The term "TGP" is not much used in mainstream media, but it is extremely common in online pornography venues; a search for it on the adult industry site http://www.avn.com yields 233 articles. The charge of "spam magnet" is not a valid argument for deletion; we have other tools to deal with that problem. AxelBoldt (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep like AxalBoldt, this is commonly known term and spam magnet is not reason for delete. --Zache (talk) 09:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Because this term has importance in terms of Internet websites and marketing behavior / tactics. 69.177.106.166 (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.