Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thursby Software Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thursby Software Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTABILITY. "Thursby Software Systems" currently gets one gnews hit, appears to be a press release item on a relocation; plenty of google hits, but largely automated directory hits, a few discussions of software that happens to mention the publisher. Article as it exists appears to be WP:PROMO, written by a user IDing himself as User:Thursbysoftware. References used in article are largely Thursby-generated (including the "Crunchbase" material; note the use of "our software"). Forbes article has a one-sentence mention of the company. Previous article under this title fell to speedy deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Essentially spam. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just spam. EEng (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 08:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is Wikipedia policy not to contribute primary sourced information. This is along the lines of a person creating an article about himself. Groink (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.