- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tian Boothe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. A lot of the sources are press releases and blogs, and the reliability of AllHipHop, although listed on WP:A/S based on one comment in 2008, has been questioned multiple times.[1][2][3] The article creator appears to have a history of creating articles with COI and paid editing issues. Frost 13:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, and Jamaica. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Svartner (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom ,Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article has been significantly expanded since the last "delete" !vote. Thoughts on the expansion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
*Weak Keep: There a enough sources (most of them seem good), and most importantly sources support her documentary film "You Should Never Tell", awards, and three singles. "musicianwages" doesn't look good. My only concern, does she have enough coverage, or is it WP:TOOSOON, because, in to her personal life, her career feels sparse? LastJabberwocky (talk) 05:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- @LastJabberwocky In response to "most of them seem good", I encourage you to look at the source assessment table I've made below. Toadspike [Talk] 16:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I mostly banked on the cyprus and euroweek sources, but you right they are just fancy interviews; and interviews don't count towards notability. Haven't yet analysed this kind of journalism. —LastJabberwocky (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – none of the sources cited in the article meet the standards of the GNG of being independent, reliable, significant coverage. I've been having fun with the Source Assessment Table Generator, see my full analysis below. Toadspike [Talk] 16:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 The article seems to be written by Boothe herself. There is also no byline, so I highly doubt this is independent.
|
|
~ | ✘ No | |
| This is written by a "contributor", so it is obviously a paid piece. The tone isn't neutral, either.
|
|
✘ No | ||
 No byline, so I doubt this is independent.
|
|
|
? Unknown | |
| No byline and extremely promotional tone indicate this is not independent.
|
✘ No | |||
| ~ This is an interview, so all the parts where she is talking about herself are not independent. This doesn't leave much in the way of sigcov. |
|
✘ No | ||
|
|
Unreliable (user-generated) per this RSN discussion: [4]
|
|
✘ No | |
| Nothing more than a row in a table.
|
✘ No | |||
| An interview, so not independent. The biography at the start, completely out of proportion to the vanishingly short interview, seems extremely similar to those in the paid pieces, so I'm fairly certain it came straight from the subject too.
|
Only the first two paragraphs are potentially independent; I don't think that's enough to call sigcov.
|
✘ No | ||
|
|
|
This is yet another promotional piece consisting entirely of quotes from the subject or a "review" that's obviously promotional.
|
✘ No | |
| Obviously AI-generated. Just look at "has not won any awards yet".
|
✘ No | |||
| ~ Another interview. | I count three sentences of information in the biography that is not meaningless filler. Not sigcov.
|
✘ No | ||
| This is an opinion piece written by Boothe, so not independent. It also
|
It has a grand total of one sentence actually about Boothe.
|
✘ No | ||
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.