- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tiggit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Tiggit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Contested PROD. The subject of this article appears to fail WP:GNG. I am unable to find reliable, third party independent sources that show any significant coverage of this game launcher. The article uses only the launcher's own website, a very small article on the PC Gaming Wiki that does not provide any better sources to use, and a readme. My searching around mostly only revealed forum topics about this launcher. Nick—Contact/Contribs 07:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 08:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - software article lacking reliable sources to establish notability - both refs are user-editable and thus not reliable - created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I really feel I'm taking time from you guys, so I won't change the article any more and specially I don't want to be considered a "SPA", sorry again, have a nice day. - Ramayac (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only coverage is from blogs: no RS. Doesn't pass GNG, insufficient critical discussion or notability. czar · · 03:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.