- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if this is notable or not. The absence of references concerns me. Green caterpillar 22:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral I've added the reference, and there are a few google hits. I think a prod would have been in order here. Mr Stephen 22:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - I do not feel this article is notable enough. Not to suggest that a google search is the end all test for notability (although I think some would), but a google search for Tigmoo only yields 11 hits. A search for "This great movement of ours" yields 110 hits. Fopkins | Talk 23:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per IUWACN (International Union of Wikipedians Against Cutesy Neoacronymlogisms). --Xrblsnggt 02:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- THAWFTBICSIH --Xrblsnggt 02:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "List of acronyms and initialisms: T" is a better place for it. Or *Delete per above. In any case, it should all be in capitals, otherwise it's a neologism and deletable under WP:NEO. Ohconfucius 01:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not encyclopaedic. This is a definition that could go in Wiktionary, Lists of acronyms etc but not here. BlueValour 19:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.