- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tim KC Canton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Probably not notable; only claim to significance is the website he started, and even the company he sold that website to doesn't have an article. User name (User:Kccanton) also indicates conflict of interest. Dcoetzee 07:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Gnews search didn't turn up any relevant hits (there are other Tim Cantons). Fails WP:V, and WP:BIO; claim to founding of website is not verifiable, not that it would be sufficient for notability in any case w/o further sourcing as to the website's notability. Ray (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO --Ged UK (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above mentioned reasons. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 18:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.