Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Space Visualiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 17:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Time Space Visualiser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unnotable fanzine. Anytime your printing method is photocopying you know you're not exactly Time Magazine. The article creator does have a detailed defense on the article talk page. Herostratus 00:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Moderate keep. Fairly notable on the NZ science fiction scene - would be one of the country's top two or three fan publications. Award-winning at national level. If not kept, then a merge into the New Zealand Doctor Who Fan Club would be far more appropriate than an outright deletion. Grutness...wha? 00:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There aren't any sources establishing notability. Jay32183 02:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails noteability. The Doctor Who fandom article already covers fanzines and fan groups without the need for separate articles for each and every one. --The Missing Hour 10:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Doctor Who fandom. This magazine is probably not individually notable, but the fan scene as a whole is. EALacey 13:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.