Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time and stress management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Time and stress management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is an essay. Information on the topic is already covered at Time management and Stress management. Think outside the box 12:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as essay/how to guide. Not encyclopaedic. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 14:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per Think outside the box, per Handschuh, and as management fad-wannabe bollocks. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment It is remarkably ironic that we should be wasting our time deleting such wise words. I have saved them to my desktop as they are one of the better things I've found here. Colonel Warden 14:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete good advice, but not encyclopedic Ctjf83 21:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I got stressed out about the time I spent reading these words of wisdom. I'm glad that someone found something inspirational in this, but an encylopedia isn't the place for someone's philosophy of life. Some people dispense nuggets of wisdom... some people dump 14 tons worth. Mandsford (talk) 02:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Violates WP:OR. I give out this assignment all the time in my Law office management course. This sounds exactly like a paralegal student's essays. Redirect and merge with Time management if needed. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Definitely WP:OR, and pretty much a duplicate of the articles pointed out in the nomination already. --Nehwyn (talk) 16:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.