- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tint2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability is not demonstrated by inline citations of the reliable sources discussing the topic in-depth; I found no usable sources in the wild. Tagged with {{notability}} since October 2011. Proposed deletion contested with rationale "Deprodded. Notability is maybe questionable, but I see many news articles that mentions this term at GNews archives. Use AfD if necessary." Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with nom. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I also Googled hoping to find something and came up with nothing. Msnicki (talk) 01:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage in 3rd party sources to establish notability of this software. Dialectric (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.