Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titane Laurent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:14, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Titane Laurent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently not notable by our standards, fails WP:ARTIST. She apparently wrote God's Stuff, but I'm having difficulty seeing how that is notable either. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Having a look at God's Stuff and not sure that article should be kept either. NZFC^(talk) 00:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete search turns up diddly-squat in terms of RS.104.163.148.25 (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - recreation of a deleted page - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titane laurent. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Still non notable. I wouldn't take it as G4, though, as the prior AFD is over a decade old, and all but 2 of the participants have been inactive for years. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or Redirect to God's Stuff: I'm not seeing enough to meet GNG, but the strip itself appears to have adequate indicia of notability. My thinking is a redirect might be preferable so as to not leave a redlink as bait for re-creation, given that this is round two as to this individual. Montanabw^(talk) 21:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Notability not demonstrated, but I agree with Montanabw.Deb (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Deb, Montanabw, NZ Footballs Conscience, I've nominated God's Stuff for deletion also – the article turned out to consist mostly of the publisher's blurb from the back cover, and the article creator has claimed to be the author's husband. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG and not supported by reliable sources. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even though the name is unusual and thus Google results are easy to parse, I'm not seeing any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The comic strip has no notability either. SunChaser (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.