Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titanic by Times and Dates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 01:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think all information relating to the subject has already been well enough described in RMS Titanic. In my opinion, there is no need for a second article on this subject. Which is why I nominate this for deletion. -- SoothingR^(pour) 14:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete completely redundant (and appallingly formatted) Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 14:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. One article is enough. --Rob 18:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unnecessary. Looks like a C&P from somewhere. 23skidoo 22:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as duplicate info. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.