Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To, The Principal...yours sincerely

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 08:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To, The Principal...yours sincerely

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable Book. Fails WP:N. Dengero (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a search and there just isn't any/enough coverage of this book in independent and reliable sources to show notability enough to pass notability guidelines for books.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 01:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of WP:GNG. No significant coverage produced. Secret of success · talk 14:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google News and Books provided nothing relevant but any relevant sources probably wouldn't be Internet-based especially for India. Additionally, the book was probably mostly distributed to schools. I appreciate the author's contribution and concept for the book but it is not notable for Wikipedia at this time. SwisterTwister talk 01:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reviews or even brief mentions by published secondary sources. Because of the lack of coverage, it does not meet the general notability guideline or the guideline for books.--xanchester (t) 03:37, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.