- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Toad's Tool 64 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Rom Hacking Program. Internet Cruft. Newspaper98 03:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - Looks like self-promotion. Google search came up with nothing relevant Corpx 03:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete promotional, notability unestablished--ZayZayEM 05:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, uh, I don't know how to properly edit this page and add my tidbit, but why delete this just because it's about a ROM hacking utility? Lunar Magic has its own section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Magic#Lunar_Magic), so I don't see what would be so bad about letting TT64 have its own article.
- TS Death Angel 10:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & CommentActually Lunar Magic does NOT have it's own article, but a reference in Super Mario World. Wildthing61476 12:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn software, no reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Author needs to take it to Data Crystal. Though it amuses me to download it to my computer, it fails criteria in WP:NOTE.--Edtropolis 13:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Right, well, fair enough. After having read through the deletion policy I must agree with you. Perhaps someone can make a reference to it in the Super Mario 64 article. --TS Death Angel 06:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge with Super Mario 64--JForget 01:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.