- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tofmicq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As stated so well in the previous PROD, removed without explanation: Non-notable page discussing a high school physics teacher's exam strategy. Completely unreferenced, violates WP:FORUM and WP:MADEUP. AndrewRT(Talk) 00:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Qwfp (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for violating every WP:OR-related guideline we have and some which we haven't got yet but clearly ought to. Yunshui 雲水 14:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.