- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tole-rant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This neologism appears to have been created by a single website. While the goal of the website may be noble, it is not clear that the site is yet notable. Even if the site becomes notable, this article is a coatrack, purportedly describing a new word while actually reporting about the new website. Claims that the term has gaines currency based on its entry in the Urban Dictionary are specious, as the definition given at UD matches the definition given at the website. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, most sources are not RS and the only RS (Guardian) just mentions it in passing. Roscelese (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.