Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolerances versus preferences
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to be original research and a personal essay, and hence not appropriate for Wikipedia. I have seen no evidence that the phrase "Tolerances versus preferences" is widely used in any field, and a request on the talk page in October 2005 asking for references has not brought any positive response. The only users who have substantially contributed new material to the article or supported it in the talk page are the banned User:JRR Trollkien, the banned user user:EntmootsOfTrolls, and the original anonymous contributor, also banned (who could well in fact be the same individual as the two banned users, based on the editing history). Enchanter 00:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reads like an essay, doesn't cite sources. OR. -- Vary | Talk 01:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's an essay. Aplomado talk 01:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; WP:OR--TBCTaLk?!? 03:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ILovePlankton 04:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat 05:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, If I had to write a term paper on this, I would suddenly be really happy. But it fails WP:NOR. --Alphachimp talk 06:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research, aka essay. -- Docether 14:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete... do I even need to give the reason? (PS its the same as above) Easter rising 16:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --->|Newyorktimescrossword 20:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)|[reply]
- Delete original research Wep 22:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.