- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tongbram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no coverage in either reliable or unreliable sources for this surname. SL93 (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—While it certainly exists, I'm not finding any coverage to indicate its notability. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 00:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there's nothing about this particular name that makes it more noteworthy than any other name--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 06:23, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.