- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 19:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tony Awor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable football agent. Google produces few hits other than Facebook or Twitter, other than those mentioned in the article. Of those, only the Total Football interview mentions him at length. In addition, I suspect that the article's main author User:Antondefoe is the subject himself, or closely connected with him.Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Coverage does not appear to be significant, and it therefore looks as though he fails the GNG. I share the nominators suspicions about the creator being the subject, due to his editing pattern. —WFC— 06:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable individual. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant coverage. --Jimbo[online] 12:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 11:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage. Non-notable. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 16:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage. --Reckless182 (talk) 12:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.