- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tora Dojo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable martial art without any third person sources to support it. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found no independent sources showing notability. When this article was discussed at the martial arts project's article review, no one produced an independent source then, either. Astudent0 (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This appears to be another "new" martial art that simply combines techniques from a variety of existing ones. My search found no independent sources that support notability. Papaursa (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.