- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Torah magic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Article has been tagged since 2008 with sourcing issues. All references are to personal pages, and the talk page even indicates that sources are not to be found. MSJapan (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are no sources in this article to demonstrate that this term has any usage or that it meets any Wikipedia standard of notability. Alansohn (talk) 04:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Two of the three sources are {{deadlink}}s and point to 404 errors. The other remaining source does not prove the notability of the topic. Also, a search shows no relevant news results for "Torah magic". - tucoxn\talk 10:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google searches (such as this) lead to many false friends, such as articles on kaballah. Bearian (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This isn't a notable subject. Ducknish (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.