- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The 40th highest building in the Paris region. Nothing makes it outstanding or encyclopedic. The relevant information is already covered in List of tallest buildings and structures in the Paris region anyway. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour Gambetta. Punkmorten 16:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - it's old enough and visible enough to justify an article if more information was provided. Right now the article is short enough to be merged into a longer article. Hatch68 16:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the article, this article is about one of the oldest skyscraper in Paris, which used to be the tallest of the city once built. It offers a picture of the building, which is not the case of the list mentionned, and its content may be expanded later, I see no reason to remove it. Metropolitan 18:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing especially notable about this particular building. Eusebeus 00:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe top 10, if 4-10 have independent notariety, this is nn all the way. SkierRMH 04:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, one of the oldest buildings in La Defense. Isn't that notable enough? It doesn't mean that a building is the 40th highest building in Paris makes it non-notable. It really depends, the facts of the building etc. Terence Ong 05:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Terence. Jean de Mailly is a very famous and prize-winning architect in France. Ohconfucius 06:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I came across this article from La Defense. This is the only article with a picture of the initial organic skyscrapers in the region. David s graff 17:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Important example of late 20th century "purpose-built" Parisian architecture. --Oakshade 06:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.