Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toy Commander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Commander

Toy Commander (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGAME and WP:GNG. Received ratings from game sites but no significant commentary.

Also nominating the game's extension:

Toy Racer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — Zawl 14:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep Toy Commander Many notable gaming publications have reviewed this game: GameSpot, IGN, Electronic Gaming Monthly, Game Informer, etc. GameRankings lists 22 reviews: [1]. --Mika1h (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Toy Racer to Toy Commander, short article with no references. Only few possible sources to use even if it were expanded. Easily fits inside Toy Commander article. --Mika1h (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Mobygames definitely lists enough significant contemporaneous reviews. Not necessarily all in English but surely enough to ensure notability for the game. Toy Racer may not pass GNG but it surely can be merged into Toy Commander without deletion._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - GameRankings shows 22 dedicated reviews alone. While not every single one is an RS, as noted above, more than enough are. This...was already present in the article, so this is really the worst type of failure of WP:BEFORE. Sergecross73 msg me 18:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No notability issue. Daiquping (talk)
• Keep - Meets the requirements for notability. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 17:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Sergecross73, passes WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.