- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Très bien! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:MUSIC. google and google news search yield nothing. lead member gets very little coverage [1]. I note they're unsigned which probably explains the lack of coverage and hence notability.LibStar (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:1E could also apply to them as well. Tavix | Talk 14:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, non-notable as yet.--Talain (talk) 03:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Klat" 09:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.