- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 05:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tracy Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not appear to match criteria for notability per WP:N / WP:POLITICIAN - currently unelected candidate, it's not a first-level sub-national election, and no alternative sources to cite notability for any other reason. Contested prod. CultureDrone (talk) 13:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom (fails WP:POLITICIAN)... - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - will possibly be notable after the election, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Frickeg (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Easily fails WP:POLITICIAN as being an unelected candidate. . I had nomininated this for a speedy delete and was surprised when it was declined. This and several others (since deleted) are being added in advance of a state election later this year.--Dmol (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Provisional keep - was a candidate in 2006 elections and mentioned in Queensland State newspaper Courier Mail here. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unelected candidate, fails WP:POLITICIAN. WWGB (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 06:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Contrary to the nomination it is "a first-level sub-national election"; Queensland is a first level sub-national entity of Australia (i.e. a state). That said, the article is almost irretrievably promotional in tone; perhaps a redirect to the Liberal National Party article? -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.